Emily Dickinson and Her Many Hyphens \\\ By Ben Eggleston
Pick up Emily Dickinson’s Poem 435[1], and one can’t help but notice the hyphens. They are sprinkled liberally, even recklessly, throughout the poem. Every line has at least one extra-long dash taking the place of a comma, a period, or inserted where no punctuation would normally be found. They are a little jarring. Depending on one’s feelings regarding proactive punctuation, they could even be alarming. However haphazard they may seem, they occupy nearly half of 435’s real estate on the page, and any self-respecting student of literature should assume that a skilled artist such as Dickinson brings method to her madness. Not coincidentally, the poem itself deals with Reason (with a capital R) and Madness, and how the one is often found in the guise of the other. The hyphens, on closer examination, help unify the poem’s structure with its message, which can be summarized as follows: Often a thoughtful observer will find Reason in seemingly mad or senseless occurrences. And often the Majority will decide that something is logical and overflowing with Reason, and anyone who dares to point out the Madness that is being overlooked will be labeled Mad themselves, and “handled with a chain.” The humble hyphen, in the hands of a master poet, becomes very expressive in this poem. It adds to the message in a variety of ways. Specifically…
The dissection of the poem into hyphenated chunks is an agent of sedition in the reader’s mind. It has the potential to create suspicion regarding the sanity of the speaker. It is not too much of a stretch to imagine the words coming in fits and starts to a madwoman incapable of sustaining coherent thought for more than a few words at a time. Were the insane speaker to do an oral presentation, perhaps the dashes would manifest as twitches and pauses taken to collect her thoughts. If Dickinson’s intent was actually to present the speaker as a little crazy, it’s a humorous touch. The poem’s dramatic cry, “The Majority labels me as insane whenever I disagree with them,” is undermined to ironic effect if the speaker is, in fact, insane.
The impression given by 435 is that the speaker is not on board with the Majority, and is one of those who find themselves being handled with a chain for their alternative lines of thinking. The interrupted nature of 435 (courtesy of the hyphen) could then be a metaphor: My poem is interrupted just like all my intellectual endeavors are interrupted by a narrow minded, judgmental Majority. In this case, the poem’s structure serves to add a note of protest to its somewhat resigned tone.
There is a hyphen at the end of the poem, which reads like this: “…and handled with a Chain—“ A hyphen is used in between text. One does not usually end something with a hyphen. This creates the suggestion that the speaker was unable to finish for some reason. Given the message that precedes it, the hyphenated ending gives rise to the eerie feeling that the speaker has been dragged of in chains before she could finish. This makes sense according to the rules of the poem: Choose not to side with the Majority, and you will be handled with a chain. The speaker certainly made that choice, and now she must live with the consequences.
A close reading of 435 reveals that the enthusiastic distribution of hyphens is not random, or pointless, or done just to do something different; The hyphens pull their weight in the poem by variously supporting, undermining, or adding to the message, or even all at the same time, depending on one’s interpretation.
I thought Ben's way of interpreting why Dickinson placed the hyphens where she did was very insightful. However he backed up his theories with straight evidence from the poem, not just with his personal ideas which made the argument much more convincing. He proved his point successfully and with language that kept the paper engaging as well as easy to understand even if someone had not studied the poem as closely.
ReplyDeleteThe ideas presented in Ben's essay show a lot of thought and effort. Each idea was well developed and separate from the others which made the essay interesting to read because he was not just saying the same thing over and over. However even though each idea was separate they were still connected by the subject of the poem and the language. The language of the essay flowed very well making the piece interesting and easy to read
ReplyDeleteBen worked really hard for this essay. I can see how much effort Ben put on this essay. The language of this essay flowed without any awkwardness. His personal idea sounds interesting. Especially, he keeps concerning what he wants to say. It's pretty nice that I surely know what he wants to say in the essay.
ReplyDeleteBen's essay is exemplary due to its many insights into Dickinson's placement of hyphens and its sophisticated vocabulary. Each idea is presented well and supported by evidence from the poem, making the essay structurally well written. I found the fourth paragraph especially interesting and insightful since I hadn't considered that possibility and it helped me to understand another reason for Dickinson's use of hyphens. The varied vocabulary also strengthens the paper, making it much more intriguing. Ben's word choice causes the tone of the essay, though formal, to have a touch of humor that makes it entertaining and easy to read.
ReplyDeleteI found Ben's essay to be interesting and convincing due to his compelling argument about the use and purpose of the hyphens as well as his insight into the majority. He supplemented his already solid arguments with evidence as well as with some strong vocabulary and humor that spices up his essay with out losing his serious tone on issues of importance. Furthermore I enjoyed this essay because he had brought up some ideas I had not thought of such as the final hyphen and its symbolism. In the process of reading the essay he convinced me to believe his arguments by backing them up logically.
ReplyDeleteI found this essay to be the most interesting and witty. It was a very interesting way to give your insight on the poem, because it was also serious but funny at the same time. I also appreciated the descriptive detail in the second to last paragraph that took lines from the poem and painted a picture of what was happening in your head. Overall, you made a lot of great points and did a great job at giving the punctuation in Emily's poem a personality and a deeper meaning.
ReplyDeletereading Ben's essay was not a bore. i didn't have to force myself to keep reading. i credit this to a couple aspects of his writing. i found Ben's essay to be very witty and intelligent. although his words were written on paper, his writing style was very loud. the word choice and language was also very compelling. by using different, more complex, vocabulary such as "recklessly... jarring... alarming..." Ben was able to add new urgency to this century-old poem. His clear voice, selective word choice and fluency added to the already logical and intriguing arguments to help polish his stellar essay.
ReplyDelete