Friday, September 9, 2011

E block--James on 435


James Wronoski
9/8/2011
E-Block
Making sense of “Much Madness is Divinest Sense”

            The influence of a writer’s upbringing often foretells who the writer will become and what his or her personal writing style will be. There is no situation where this is more evident than in the case of American poet, Emily Dickinson. In her early life, Dickinson was exposed to the flaws in the authoritarian rule that men imposed on women in the nineteenth century. Her father, Edward Dickinson, firmly believed in the nineteenth century notion that women, regardless of class or intellect, were limited inherently by their gender. In the mind of Edward Dickinson, being the man of the house meant ruling the family with an iron fist especially when it came to Emily and her mother. In Emily’s childhood she witnessed the power that her father exercised over her mother, writing that when her father spoke her mother “trembled, obeyed and was silent”. Despite the fact that Edward Dickinson held a tyrannical rule over his wife, Emily revered Edward and had untold respect for him. Emily’s upbringing left her in awe of her father while igniting a passionate resentment towards the male dictatorship of the mid-1800s. Emily’s struggles with female oppression molded her into one of American Literature’s greatest poets.
            At first glance Dickinson’s poem, “Much Madness is Divinest Sense”, seems too brief to hold any deep meaning but when the reader can understand who Emily Dickinson was, it is easy to draw conclusions about the poem’s meaning. When this poem is viewed from the standpoint of Emily Dickinson it is quite simple to make divinest sense of the poem’s madness. This poem is Dickinson’s commentary on the male dominated society that she lived in during the mid-1800s. In line one when Dickinson talks about madness, madness is referring to the fact that in the 19th century, oppression of women was quite acceptable and even expected. That is why Dickinson says that madness is divinest sense; when she says sense, she means to say that it is the accepted social standard, not that it truly makes sense for women to be oppressed. In a way, Dickinson is fiercely rejecting the ideas of people like her father who put limitations on women, especially intelligent and educated women like her. In the second and third lines Dickinson specifies that it is only to the discerning eye that madness is sensible which is somewhat ironic when it is clear that anyone who believes that the oppression of women is sensible or justified must be ignorant. Then in the next line when Dickinson says that it is the majority that believes this, she is saying that no one attempts to combat the injustices that are done unto women in that time period therefore it is the majority of people who believe this form of sexism to be acceptable. From her point of view, people simply accepted the madness of this injustice as a part of life.
            In the final three lines, Dickinson concludes sarcastically that people in society who adhere to the status quo and accept that oppression is an inevitable aspect of life are sane, while those who make an effort to fight for equality against the male dictatorship are deemed dangerous and unfit for social interaction. These lines are in a way making reference to the fact that Dickinson’s own sanity was constantly called into question. By connecting the fact that society viewed her as insane to the fact that people who stand up against male tyranny are viewed in that same light, one can conclude with certainty that Dickinson is siding with those who combat the social injustice of sexism in the 19th century.
            Through-out the poem, the theme of fighting injustice towards women is paramount. This is quite obvious if we are simply to look at the evidence in Emily Dickinson’s personal life and her relationship with Edward Dickinson. From that relationship stemmed an idea; the idea that the status of women in American culture is not set and that if oppression is met head-on, with strong opposition, it can be stopped. Dickinson expressed this idea with zeal in “Much Madness is Divinest Sense” and she argued her point successfully.

10 comments:

  1. As I was reading the two other papers about the poem I didn’t read about, James paper caught my eyes because he had a really good opening topic sentence that explained why Emily Dickinson wrote this poem because of her childhood and how her father treated her and some history on that time period and that interested me. So I kept on going and what I noticed that was in fact when he explained a line from the poem he got right into it and explained by getting to the point and not repeating himself and going around in circles and that truly help me understand the poem better. Other thing that I certainly liked is that in the end of the paper he has an good ending statement wrapping everything up by adding the topic sentence again and giving his thoughts into it.
    -Shira Hartman

    ReplyDelete
  2. I found this essay interesting because its point about the oppression of women had not occurred to me when I read it. Then the author went on to support it very strongly. I think he used his evidence very convincingly to support what I though is a not very obvious meaning of the poem.
    --Marie Kolarik

    ReplyDelete
  3. I liked James' essay because in his introduction he showed exactly how Dickinson was brought up and what her role was in female opression and then clearly connected that to the poem at the end of the intro and later in the paper.
    - Josef Shohet

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like how James was able to use evidence from Dickinson's personal life to clearly and simply explain how Dickinson is specifically referring to the oppression of women in the 19th century when at first glance, the poem doesn't seem to have much meaning at all.
    -Oliver Sablove

    ReplyDelete
  5. Overall James' essay was outstanding and helped me understand the poem in a completely new way. The quality that stood out most to me was the word choice that James used. The impressive language that he used throughout the poem provided me with a more clear image of what he was trying to say. It also helped to make the content more interesting to learn about. Phrases like "igniting a passionate reresentment" are what separate great essays from good ones. I also thought that James' balance between background information and relation to the poem itself was in perfect order.
    - Jamie Lamoureux

    ReplyDelete
  6. I like James' essay because it had a common theme for a thesis: fighting injustice towards women. He incorporated this into every paragraph and part of the poem, which made the essay smooth and meaningful. I also like how he was able to incorporate not only what was going on in the 1860's in general, but also what was going on in Emily Dickinson's life. I didn't understand the poem at first, but after James' clear analysis, I understand it much better.
    -Lindsey Pearlstein

    ReplyDelete
  7. I really like how James' essay flows easily and uses a lot of rich vocabulary. Overall, his essay was written very well, which made it very easy to read; I didn't have to reread any sentences or words. I also really liked how he opened and closed his essay. His first sentence, and whole paragraph, made me want to keep reading; I liked the historical background very much. James stayed clear and concise throughout his essay, and wrapped it up nicely restating his thesis.
    -Siena Fried

    ReplyDelete
  8. Jame's essay was to the point and very convincing.As someone who has a hard time being concise and is often too wordy, I amdired that he didn't seem to ramble at any point. I also loved that he really looked at EVERY line of the poem and took time to analyze them and relate them in a way that made complete sense, instead of picking and choosing which lines he thought would best prove his point. The fact that he was then able to sucessfully connect all of them made his argument significantly stronger.
    ~Lily Waldron

    ReplyDelete
  9. James' essay right from the start helped me understand this poem with looking at her upbringing. In this essay, using knowledge of Dickinson's life, it helped show where the meaning of the difficult to understand poem. The points that James makes relating the way she lived her life to what was represented in the poem helped me see where the thoughts behind the poem came from. These points were also supported strongly and analyzed deeply to convey to the reader of the essay what dickinson was trying to explain in this poem. The way James wrote this essay made the poem much more relatable and easier to grasp.
    -Chloe Fishman

    ReplyDelete
  10. What I like about this essay is that it is different. Most bibliographical analyses concerning Dickinson's work always seem to end up discussing her seclusion and unusual social behavior. Although a case like that could have easily been made about this poem, it would have been more mundane. By choosing a less frequently discussed aspect, James made his work stand out. However, it was not different for the sake of different - the arguments were really strong. They showed extensive research on Emily's life and they also focused on specifics from the text, the two elements balancing each other out. The essay was convincing, original, well organized and beautifully written throughout.
    -Dimitar Dimitrov

    ReplyDelete